This is a great article by Charles Moore in the St Johns Telgraph-Journal, and should be required reading for the Liberal minded (code for Ontario voters) among us. Also a great primer to rebutt those who regurgitate liberal media bias like it's their own concise analysis. SIHSJ Telegraph-Journal | Guest Commentaries
As published on April 21, 2005
LIBERAL MEDIA MYTH-MAKERSWill propaganda and disinformation derail Harper again?
Polls show the Conservative party surging strongly in popularity, but its leader, Stephen Harper, trailing the party's numbers - one poll noting that respondents found Paul Martin more prime ministerial. That's doubtless partly because Mr. Martin is prime minister, which makes him easier to imagine in the role. But it's fair to say that while Canadians are less than enthralled with Mr. Martin, they really haven't warmed to Mr. Harper over the three years he's been leader of the Alliance and Conservative parties.
If you listen to Mr. Harper's speeches, he's not nearly as dull and uncharismatic as popular conventional wisdom would have you believe. He's actually a pleasantly fluid speaker, clear, on point, even entertaining and subtly witty. Content-independent, I much prefer listening to Mr. Harper than to Mr. Martin's pompously sanctimonious bombast.
However, popular misconception about Mr. Harper's oratorical skills signalizes the dynamic that poses the greatest obstacle to his becoming prime minister. A sizable proportion of Canadians have formed stereotyped impressions of Stephen Harper that range from patently untrue to ideologically nuanced half-truths. Helped of course by an always well-oiled Liberal propaganda machine, and a fellow-traveling, liberal/left dominated media. Let's consider a few examples of anti-Harper allegations I've seen in print this past week.
Innuendo: Mr. Harper is a George Bush lapdog who would have signed Canadaon to the U.S. ballistic missile defence program.
Fact: Unlike Paul Martin and Foreign Minister Bill Graham, who favoured the BMD and later flip-flopped, Mr. Harper never came out in support of the program, and indeed received a verbal spanking from President Bush for not being more supportive.
Innuendo: Mr. Harper would dismantle Medicare and replace it with American-style corporate health care.
Fact: No Canadian politician with realistic aspirations to govern would ever entertain the idea of doing away with core Medicare principles of universal access to health care regardless of ability to pay. Everyone of goodwill (which includes small-c conservatives, notwithstanding insinuations to the contrary) wants a health care delivery system that gives Canadians timely access to good medical care. There are differing views on how this objective may be accomplished most efficiently and effectively. Liberals are fond of "progressive" ideological notions but weak on practical follow-through. Conservatives are fond of systems that work.
Now, here's a reality check. Liberals, self-styled champions and defenders of Canada Health Act Medicare have been in power for a dozen years. Are health care access, waiting periods, and so forth, better now that they were in 1993? Be honest.
Mr. Harper and the Tories think health care spending decisions and priority-setting should be left to the provinces, which is why Mr. Harper said of last year's federal-provincial Health Accord: "In general, this is a deal that the Conservative party can easily support."
Conservative policy is for the federal government to cooperate with the provinces to ensure adequate funding, shorter waiting lists, improved access, and more doctors and nurses, improving access to health care for all, including private delivery of publicly funded health care services if that can be demonstrated work better. Does that sound like an agenda to dismantle Medicare?
Innuendo: Mr. Harper has a hidden agenda to impose fundamentalist right-wing Christian values.
Reality check: Speaking as a conservative Christian traditionalist, I wish! Mr. Harper is a member of the Christian & Missionary Alliance church, a small, evangelical denomination doctrinally quite similar to Baptist churches. Millions of Canadians are evangelicals - a constituency the Liberal party chose to insult last spring when Liberal pollsters asked Ontarians whether they would be "more or less likely to vote for the Conservative/Alliance if you knew they had been taken over by evangelical Christians." Mr. Harper (and the party) oppose redefining marriage to
include homosexual relationships (as do some 46% to 63% of Canadians according to various polls), but propose the alternative of civil unions with all the civil benefits and obligations of marriage.
Mr. Harper consistently maintained throughout last year's election campaign, and ever since, that a Conservative government will not support any legislation to regulate abortion (alas), a position the party reconfirmed at its recent policy convention.
Innuendo: A Harper-led Conservative government would allow industry to run roughshod over the environment.
Fact: The Conservative Party has stated that it would achieve Kyoto Accord targets "in a realistic fashion," and the party's policy affirms that it will fight for a clean environment and "propose workable solutions to make Canada a world leader in clean air, clean water and clean land."
Innuendo: Mr. Harper is anti-bilingual and anti-Quebec,
Fact: Mr. Harper is bilingual. The party held its recent policy convention in Montreal, where there was near-unanimous endorsement of official bilingualism, and policy was reaffirmed that "Canada's official languages constitute a unique and significant social advantage that benefits all Canadians."
Mr. Harper deserves to win or lose on what he actually stands for - not urban myth and disinformation.
Charles W. Moore is a Nova Scotia based freelance writer and editor. He can
be reached by e-mail at cwmoore@gmx.net. His column appears each Thursday